Short analysis of ongoing situation in Pakistan

Goverment-stance: French ambassador exit means animosity with all the Europeon Union. That means loss of billions of dallars coming from expatriots Pakistani working in europeon nations.

TLP-stance: Abide by the agreed terms of the agreement signed by ex.interior minister (Brig. Aijaz shah). They are also right in this regard.

Analysis:

 who is responsible for ongoing fiasco. Brig Aijaz and noor ul haq qadri, who signed the agreed terms without considering the consequences.

Pakistan cannot stand loss of billions in the form of remmitances lost due to diplomatic bycot with EU. IK government is alreasy short of dollars.They are already abiding by the IMF's excruciating terms and conditions. The economic repercussions would be much more inflation when public is already worried of high prices.

Solution 1: 

Ask publically to TLP leadership that if they want the exit of French foreign minister than they take the responsibility of upcomming inflation and high prices. IK government will politically win because no one will agree.

solution 2: 

Government to announce bycott of french products at national level and send French diplomats back temporarily to forego heat of the moment.

solution 3:

and if government continued crackdown their is the chance of international bad name for Pakistan. We will be highlighted again as an extremist nation and many lives would be lost.

Moral:

 If state had provided the required education and ethical teachings of Islam in schools, this would not have happened.

When government wants to save money by leaving education unto madrassah system this(harsh protests and breaking law and order) would remain the bone of contention.

Harsh Reality:

 The question of Prophet's love cannot be induced on other nations until we as a nation become strong enough financially and diplomatically. Or all muslim counteries are not on same page like europeon union.

Beggers are not respected in the world we are living.

(Its just an opinion, anyone has the right to disagree)